在上一篇文章中,我们看到了一个典型的事务处理失败的案例,其主要原因在于,service层和各个DAO所使用的Connection是不一样的,而JDBC中事务处理的作用对象正是Connection对象,所以不同DAO中的操作不在同一个事务里面,从而导致事务失败。从中我们得出了教训:要避免这种失败,我们可以使所有操作共享一个Connection对象,这样应该就没有问题了。
在本篇文章中,我们将看到一个成功的,但是丑陋的事务处理方案,它的基本思路是:在service层创建Connection对象,再将该Connection传给各个DAO类,这样就完成了Connection共享的目的。
修改两个DAO类,使他们都接受一个Connection对象,定义UglyBankDao类如下:
public class UglyBankDao
{
public void withdraw(int bankId, int amount, Connection connection) throws SQLException
{
PreparedStatement selectStatement = connection.prepareStatement("SELECT BANK_AMOUNT FROM BANK_ACCOUNT WHERE BANK_ID = ?");
selectStatement.setInt(1, bankId);
ResultSet resultSet = selectStatement.executeQuery();
resultSet.next();
int previousAmount = resultSet.getInt(1);
resultSet.close();
selectStatement.close();
int newAmount = previousAmount - amount;
PreparedStatement updateStatement = connection.prepareStatement("UPDATE BANK_ACCOUNT SET BANK_AMOUNT = ? WHERE BANK_ID = ?");
updateStatement.setInt(1, newAmount);
updateStatement.setInt(2, bankId);
updateStatement.execute();
updateStatement.close();
}
}
使用同样的方法,定义UglyInsuranceDao类:
public class UglyInsuranceDao
{
public void deposit(int insuranceId, int amount, Connection connection) throws SQLException
{
PreparedStatement selectStatement = connection.prepareStatement("SELECT INSURANCE_AMOUNT FROM INSURANCE_ACCOUNT WHERE INSURANCE_ID = ?");
selectStatement.setInt(1, insuranceId);
ResultSet resultSet = selectStatement.executeQuery();
resultSet.next();
int previousAmount = resultSet.getInt(1);
resultSet.close();
selectStatement.close();
int newAmount = previousAmount + amount;
PreparedStatement updateStatement = connection.prepareStatement("UPDATE INSURANCE_ACCOUNT SET INSURANCE_AMOUNT = ? WHERE INSURANCE_ID = ?");
updateStatement.setInt(1, newAmount);
updateStatement.setInt(2, insuranceId);
updateStatement.execute();
updateStatement.close();
}
}
然后修改Service类,在UglyBankService类的transfer方法中,首先创建一个Connection对象,然后在将该对象依次传给UglyBankDao的withdraw方法和UglyInsuranceDao类的deposit方法,这样service层和DAO层使用相同的Connection对象。定义UglyBankService类如下:
public class UglyBankService implements BankService
{
private DataSource dataSource;
private UglyBankDao uglyBankDao;
private UglyInsuranceDao uglyInsuranceDao;
public UglyBankService(DataSource dataSource)
{
this.dataSource = dataSource;
}
public void transfer(int fromId, int toId, int amount)
{
Connection connection = null;
try
{
connection = dataSource.getConnection();
connection.setAutoCommit(false);
uglyBankDao.withdraw(fromId, amount, connection);
uglyInsuranceDao.deposit(toId, amount, connection);
connection.commit();
} catch (Exception e)
{
try
{
assert connection != null;
connection.rollback();
} catch (SQLException e1)
{
e1.printStackTrace();
}
} finally
{
try
{
assert connection != null;
connection.close();
} catch (SQLException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
public void setUglyBankDao(UglyBankDao uglyBankDao)
{
this.uglyBankDao = uglyBankDao;
}
public void setUglyInsuranceDao(UglyInsuranceDao uglyInsuranceDao)
{
this.uglyInsuranceDao = uglyInsuranceDao;
}
}
通过上面共享Connection对象的方法虽然可以完成事务处理的目的,但是这样做法是丑陋的,原因在于:为了完成事务处理的目的,我们需要将一个底层的Connection类在service层和DAO层之间进行传递,而DAO层的方法也要接受这个Connection对象,这种做法显然是不好的,这就是典型的API污染。