/*
* Called from run_local_timers in hardirq context every jiffy
*/
void hrtimer_run_queues(void)
{
struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base = this_cpu_ptr(&hrtimer_bases);
ktime_t now;
if (__hrtimer_hres_active(cpu_base))
return;
/*
* This _is_ ugly: We have to check periodically, whether we
* can switch to highres and / or nohz mode. The clocksource
* switch happens with xtime_lock held. Notification from
* there only sets the check bit in the tick_oneshot code,
* otherwise we might deadlock vs. xtime_lock.
*/
if (tick_check_oneshot_change(!hrtimer_is_hres_enabled())) {
hrtimer_switch_to_hres();
return;
}
raw_spin_lock(&cpu_base->lock);
now = hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
__hrtimer_run_queues(cpu_base, now);
raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_base->lock);
}
static void __hrtimer_run_queues(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base, ktime_t now)
{
struct hrtimer_clock_base *base = cpu_base->clock_base;
unsigned int active = cpu_base->active_bases;
for (; active; base++, active >>= 1) {
struct timerqueue_node *node;
ktime_t basenow;
if (!(active & 0x01))
continue;
basenow = ktime_add(now, base->offset);
while ((node = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active))) {
struct hrtimer *timer;
timer = container_of(node, struct hrtimer, node);
/*
* The immediate goal for using the softexpires is
* minimizing wakeups, not running timers at the
* earliest interrupt after their soft expiration.
* This allows us to avoid using a Priority Search
* Tree, which can answer a stabbing querry for
* overlapping intervals and instead use the simple
* BST we already have.
* We don't add extra wakeups by delaying timers that
* are right-of a not yet expired timer, because that
* timer will have to trigger a wakeup anyway.
*/
if (basenow.tv64 < hrtimer_get_softexpires_tv64(timer))
break;
__run_hrtimer(cpu_base, base, timer, &basenow);
}
}
}
/*
* The write_seqcount_barrier()s in __run_hrtimer() split the thing into 3
* distinct sections:
*
* - queued: the timer is queued
* - callback: the timer is being ran
* - post: the timer is inactive or (re)queued
*
* On the read side we ensure we observe timer->state and cpu_base->running
* from the same section, if anything changed while we looked at it, we retry.
* This includes timer->base changing because sequence numbers alone are
* insufficient for that.
*
* The sequence numbers are required because otherwise we could still observe
* a false negative if the read side got smeared over multiple consequtive
* __run_hrtimer() invocations.
*/
static void __run_hrtimer(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
struct hrtimer_clock_base *base,
struct hrtimer *timer, ktime_t *now)
{
enum hrtimer_restart (*fn)(struct hrtimer *);
int restart;
lockdep_assert_held(&cpu_base->lock);
debug_deactivate(timer);
cpu_base->running = timer;
/*
* Separate the ->running assignment from the ->state assignment.
*
* As with a regular write barrier, this ensures the read side in
* hrtimer_active() cannot observe cpu_base->running == NULL &&
* timer->state == INACTIVE.
*/
raw_write_seqcount_barrier(&cpu_base->seq);
__remove_hrtimer(timer, base, HRTIMER_STATE_INACTIVE, 0);
timer_stats_account_hrtimer(timer);
fn = timer->function;
/*
* Clear the 'is relative' flag for the TIME_LOW_RES case. If the
* timer is restarted with a period then it becomes an absolute
* timer. If its not restarted it does not matter.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TIME_LOW_RES))
timer->is_rel = false;
/*
* Because we run timers from hardirq context, there is no chance
* they get migrated to another cpu, therefore its safe to unlock
* the timer base.
*/
raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_base->lock);
trace_hrtimer_expire_entry(timer, now);
restart = fn(timer);
trace_hrtimer_expire_exit(timer);
raw_spin_lock(&cpu_base->lock);
/*
* Note: We clear the running state after enqueue_hrtimer and
* we do not reprogram the event hardware. Happens either in
* hrtimer_start_range_ns() or in hrtimer_interrupt()
*
* Note: Because we dropped the cpu_base->lock above,
* hrtimer_start_range_ns() can have popped in and enqueued the timer
* for us already.
*/
if (restart != HRTIMER_NORESTART &&
!(timer->state & HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED))
enqueue_hrtimer(timer, base);
/*
* Separate the ->running assignment from the ->state assignment.
*
* As with a regular write barrier, this ensures the read side in
* hrtimer_active() cannot observe cpu_base->running == NULL &&
* timer->state == INACTIVE.
*/
raw_write_seqcount_barrier(&cpu_base->seq);
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_base->running != timer);
cpu_base->running = NULL;
}
Linux 内核时钟之高精度处理
原创sunlei0625 ©著作权
©著作权归作者所有:来自51CTO博客作者sunlei0625的原创作品,请联系作者获取转载授权,否则将追究法律责任
提问和评论都可以,用心的回复会被更多人看到
评论
发布评论
相关文章
-
高精度除高精度
高精度除法1)高精度除高精度传入参数约定:传入第一第二个参数均为string类型,第三个为int型,返回值为strin
高精度除法 高精度 #include 数组