验证OSPF中对外部路由路由的选择规则
 [实验]OSPF对外部路由的选路规则完全验证版_职场
OSPF在选择外部路由的时候,遵循的原则是:
       [1]O E1优于O E2
       [2]在同样的情况下,Cost越小越优先
       [3]cost相同的情况下,选择到达ASBR最优的路径
 
下面来通过实验来验证该规则:
[案例1]当外部路由都是O E1的情况
基本配置:(注意ASBR的配置)
R1:
interface Loopback0
 ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface Serial1/0
 ip address 12.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial2/0
 ip address 13.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
redistribute rip subnets metric-type 1
 network 12.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
!
router rip
 version 2
 network 13.0.0.0
 distance 109(因为RIP的AD大于OSPF,所以重发布到OSPF中,会发生路由抖动,故将其改小,详解看等级三实验手册1.3)
 no auto-summary
!
R2:
interface Loopback0
 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface Serial1/0
 ip address 24.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial2/0
 ip address 12.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
network 12.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 24.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
!        
R3:
interface Loopback0
 ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface Serial1/0
 ip address 13.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial2/0
 ip address 35.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
!
router rip
 version 2
 network 3.0.0.0
 network 13.0.0.0
 network 35.0.0.0
 no auto-summary
!
R4:
interface Loopback0
 ip address 4.4.4.4 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface Serial1/0
 ip address 45.1.1.4 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial2/0
 ip address 24.1.1.4 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
network 24.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 45.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
!  
R5:
interface Loopback0
 ip address 5.5.5.5 255.255.255.0
 ip ospf network point-to-point
!
interface Serial1/0
 ip address 35.1.1.5 255.255.255.0
!
interface Serial2/0
 ip address 45.1.1.5 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1
redistribute rip subnets metric-type 1
 network 45.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
!        
router rip
 version 2
 network 35.0.0.0
 distance 109
 no auto-summary
!
监视和测试配置:
[实验]OSPF对外部路由的选路规则完全验证版_路由_02
查看R2的路由表:
R2#sh ip rou
     35.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E1    35.1.1.0 [110/84] via 12.1.1.1, 00:00:25, Serial2/0
     2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       2.2.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
     3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2    3.3.3.0 [110/84] via 12.1.1.1, 00:00:25, Serial2/0
     24.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       24.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1/0
     12.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       12.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial2/0
     13.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2    13.1.1.0 [110/84] via 12.1.1.1, 00:00:25, Serial2/0
     45.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA    45.1.1.0 [110/128] via 24.1.1.4, 00:00:26, Serial1/0
查看R2的ospf数据库

R1#sh ip os da
                 Type-5 AS External Link States
Link ID         ADV Router      Age         Seq#       Checksum Tag
3.3.3.0         1.1.1.1         237         0x80000001 0x00D93A 0
3.3.3.0         5.5.5.5         239         0x80000001 0x0061A2 0
13.1.1.0        1.1.1.1         509         0x80000001 0x008588 0
13.1.1.0        5.5.5.5         239         0x80000001 0x000DF0 0
35.1.1.0        1.1.1.1         238         0x80000001 0x006691 0
35.1.1.0        5.5.5.5         381         0x80000001 0x00EDF9 0
可以看到R2从两个ASBR都收到了LSA 5的通告,但是R2选择了从R1走。ASBR通告外部路由默认都是以metric值20通告出去的,但是内部接受的路由器看到是 O E1的外部路由,会加上自己到ASBR的cost值来算出新的metric值,这样实际上在我们来看只要选择到ASBR cost值小的路由器就可以了。
 
[案例2]当外部路由都是O E2的情况
在ASBR R1和R5上更改重发布命令
R1(config)#router ospf 1
R1(config-router)#redistribute rip metric-type 2 subnets
R5(config)#router ospf 1
R5(config-router)# redistribute rip metric-type 2 subnets
(注意这里直接改为 redistribute rip  subnets是没有效果的,因为前面已经将类型改为E1,这里没有指明类型,是不会改为O E2的;这样写只有原来没有作过重发布,类型默认才会为O E2)
 
 
监视和测试配置
[实验]OSPF对外部路由的选路规则完全验证版_路由_03
R2#sh ip rou
     35.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2    35.1.1.0 [110/20] via 12.1.1.1, 00:00:25, Serial2/0
     2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       2.2.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
     3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2    3.3.3.0 [110/20] via 12.1.1.1, 00:00:25, Serial2/0
     24.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       24.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1/0
     12.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       12.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial2/0
     13.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2    13.1.1.0 [110/20] via 12.1.1.1, 00:00:25, Serial2/0
     45.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA    45.1.1.0 [110/128] via 24.1.1.4, 00:00:26, Serial1/0
察看R2OSPF数据库
R2#sh ip os da
             OSPF Router with ID (2.2.2.2) (Process ID 1)
                 Type-5 AS External Link States
Link ID         ADV Router      Age         Seq#       Checksum Tag
3.3.3.0         1.1.1.1         1540        0x80000001 0x005D36 0
3.3.3.0         5.5.5.5         1551        0x80000001 0x00E49E 0
13.1.1.0        1.1.1.1         1540        0x80000001 0x000984 0
13.1.1.0        5.5.5.5         1551        0x80000001 0x0090EC 0
35.1.1.0        1.1.1.1         1540        0x80000001 0x00E98D 0
35.1.1.0        5.5.5.5         1551        0x80000001 0x0071F5 0
    可以看到R2对于每一个外部条目都从两个边界路由器分别学到了,让我们看一下它通过两个ASBR学到3.3.3.0这个路由条目的metric值是多少
R2#sh ip os da ex 3.3.3.0
             OSPF Router with ID (2.2.2.2) (Process ID 1)
                 Type-5 AS External Link States
  Routing Bit Set on this LSA
  LS age: 1595
  Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
  LS Type: AS External Link
  Link State ID: 3.3.3.0 (External Network Number )
  Advertising Router: 1.1.1.1
  LS Seq Number: 80000001
  Checksum: 0x5D36
  Length: 36
  Network Mask: /24
        Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
        TOS: 0
        Metric: 20
        Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
        External Route Tag: 0
  LS age: 1606
  Options: (No TOS-capability, DC)
  LS Type: AS External Link
  Link State ID: 3.3.3.0 (External Network Number )
  Advertising Router: 5.5.5.5
  LS Seq Number: 80000001
  Checksum: 0xE49E
  Length: 36
  Network Mask: /24
        Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path)
        TOS: 0
        Metric: 20
        Forward Address: 0.0.0.0
        External Route Tag: 0
   可以看到都是20,度量值一样,但是R2并没有作负载均衡,而是选择了从R1到达3.3.3.0网段,由于R2ASBR R1cost64,到另一个ASBR R5cost128,所以选择R1是没有疑义的,现在我们将R2R1metric值改大,看看R2是否还选择R1
R2(config)#int s2/0
R2(config-if)#ip ospf cost 200
R2(config-if)#end
重启OSPF进程看结果
R2#clear ip os pro
Reset ALL OSPF processes? [no]: y
[实验]OSPF对外部路由的选路规则完全验证版_休闲_04
R2#sh ip rou
Gateway of last resort is not set
     35.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2    35.1.1.0 [110/20] via 24.1.1.4, 00:00:20, Serial1/0
     2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       2.2.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
     3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2    3.3.3.0 [110/20] via 24.1.1.4, 00:00:20, Serial1/0
     24.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       24.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1/0
     12.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       12.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial2/0
     13.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2    13.1.1.0 [110/20] via 24.1.1.4, 00:00:20, Serial1/0
     45.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA    45.1.1.0 [110/128] via 24.1.1.4, 00:00:20, Serial1/0
       可以看到R2此时选择了R4作为下一条,也就是接收了R5通告的外部路由条目
[案例3]E1和E2路由共存的情况
       下面我们将R1通告的外部路由类型改为 O E1,来验证O E1O E2优先
R1(config-router)#redistribute rip subnets metric-type 1
R2上重启OSPF进程看结果
R2#clear ip os pro
Reset ALL OSPF processes? [no]: y
[实验]OSPF对外部路由的选路规则完全验证版_职场_05
R2#sh ip rou
Gateway of last resort is not set
R2#sh ip rou
Gateway of last resort is not set
     35.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E1    35.1.1.0 [110/220] via 12.1.1.1, 00:00:01, Serial2/0
     2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       2.2.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
     3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E1    3.3.3.0 [110/220] via 12.1.1.1, 00:00:01, Serial2/0
     24.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       24.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1/0
     12.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       12.1.1.0 is directly connected, Serial2/0
     13.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E1    13.1.1.0 [110/220] via 12.1.1.1, 00:00:01, Serial2/0
     45.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA    45.1.1.0 [110/128] via 24.1.1.4, 00:00:02, Serial1/0
可以看到R2又一次选择了R1通告的外部路由,此时虽然到R5cost小,但是没有考虑,
可见优先比较O E1O E2是首要条件
最后总结一下:(说法不同于开始的规则,只是更简单)
(1)OSPF中外部路由类型不同,优先选择O E1路由
(2)OSPF中外部路由类型相同,看到ASBR的cost值,越小越优先
[注:实际实验效果是这样,也就是我们看拓扑图,可以这样分析;但是路由器实际处理过程还是本贴开始的那个规则更符合实际情况]
 
重要问题补充说明:
在案例一和案例二中,外部路由类型相同,此时路由器看到ASBR的cost值决定路径,实际上这是OSPF内部选路的问题,从哪 里到达ASBR;而在OSPF内部选路时,第一个原则就是“O路由”>“O IA路由”,而案例二的后半步,在更改了到同一区域ASBR的cost值以后,可以发现走了从O IA路由学习到的ASBR,可见在对ASBR的选路,访问外部路由时,这个原则无效.
更多精华帖,请见:[url]www.one-tom.com/bbs[/url]