figma中文显示不出
Last year my team made the decision to try switching our complex Sketch + Abstract + Invision flow for Figma. Working in a team with multiple designers, product managers, developers, copywriters, and more stakeholders than I can remember, Figma keeps us all working in sync. The collaborative design tool is getting praise for all the right reasons and while it does many things very well, I’ve rounded up my top 10 features I’d love to see them roll out.
大号 AST年我的团队做出决定尝试切换我们对复杂的素描+摘要+的InVision流FIGMA 。 Figma使团队与多个设计师，产品经理，开发人员，撰稿人以及更多利益相关者合作，使我们所有人同步工作。 协作设计工具由于所有正确的原因而受到赞誉，尽管它在很多方面做得很好，但我已经汇总了我希望看到的十大功能。
(1. Incognito mode)
Please let me hide my cursor from others, I’m shy. While it’s possible to hide other users’ cursors, sometimes I really don’t want mine to be shown or show that I’m online.
请让我对其他人隐藏光标，我很害羞。 虽然可以隐藏其他用户的光标，但有时我确实不希望显示我的或显示我在线。
(2. Improve text-box behaviour)
I’m pretty disappointed Figma text-boxes don’t work the same way as Sketch, it’s not a dealbreaker but it is frustrating. When adjusting text alignment, Figma doesn’t retain where the origin anchor was set (where you clicked) and instead always keeps the origin as the visual top-left, making the text-alignment property pretty useless (adjusting these does absolutely nothing to inline text). In the above gif, you can see how Sketch moves the text-box origin so the text-alignment (left/right/centre) of the text box is anchored to where the text-box was initially placed. This is a behaviour crafted around designer intent rather than purist engineering. It’s also particularly useful if you are creating a new text-box and have the wrong alignment set as default as it sets your brand new box in the right place. — please fix it!
我非常失望，Figma文本框的工作方式与Sketch不同，这不是破坏交易的事情，但令人沮丧。 调整文本对齐方式时，Figma不会保留设置原点锚点的位置(单击的位置)，而是始终将原点保留为可视左上角，从而使text-alignment属性变得毫无用处( 调整这些内容对内联绝对没有任何作用文字 )。 在上面的gif文件中，您可以看到Sketch如何移动文本框的原点，从而使文本框的文本对齐方式(左/右/中)固定在最初放置文本框的位置。 这是围绕设计师意图而非纯粹的工程学设计的行为。 如果要创建一个新的文本框并将默认对齐方式设置为错误的对齐方式，则这也特别有用，因为它将正确的位置设置为全新的文本框。 —请修复它！
I also have an intermittent bug that when the font size is larger than a text-box created with a single click, Figma instantly de-selects it. It’s hard to replicate it exactly, but I often find empty text-boxes littered around my document with nothing in them.
我还有一个间歇性错误，当字体大小大于单击创建的文本框时，Figma会立即取消选择它。 很难准确地复制它，但是我经常在文档周围发现乱七八糟的空文本框，其中没有任何内容。
(3. HTML embeds)
Prototyping in Figma is pretty basic, but for what most teams use it for it does the job. Some of the more nuanced interactions though are difficult to replicate, such as onboarding videos or maps. I’d love to see HTML embeds in prototypes to unlock the potential of this tool. Imagine being able to test with videos, maps, and custom components such as forms. I’m not expecting Framer Team level of coding, but adding some dynamic elements could dramatically improve prototyping and I’d be interested to see the creative uses such a feature would open up.
Figma中的原型制作是非常基本的，但是对于大多数团队来说，使用原型制作就可以了。 一些较细微的交互虽然难以复制，例如车载视频或地图。 我很希望看到HTML嵌入原型中，以释放该工具的潜力。 想象一下，能够使用视频，地图和自定义组件(例如表单)进行测试。 我不希望使用Framer Team进行编码，但是添加一些动态元素可以极大地改善原型设计，并且我很感兴趣地看到可以使用这种功能的广告素材。
(4. Sticky background on scroll / z-index controls)
Fix position on scroll forces objects to the front
固定滚动条上的位置将对象强制移到前面
Figma already lets you fix a navigation bar, but the scrollable elements must always sit behind. This makes it hard to place a fixed background for example or replicate a parallax effect. It would be great to have finer control over the display order of these elements and allow more complex scrolling behaviour with multiple layers.
Figma已经允许您修复导航栏，但是可滚动元素必须始终位于后面。 这使得例如放置固定背景或复制视差效果变得困难。 更好地控制这些元素的显示顺序，并允许多层的更复杂滚动行为，将是很棒的。
(5. Better arrow interface)
Changing arrowheads is not very intuitive
更改箭头不是很直观
Sketch struggles here too, but can we please have different arrowheads, sizes and have an easy way to change the caps? This menu is not very intuitive to use and it’s hidden away making it difficult for even the best designers to create arrows using the first-hand tools. It’s even led to some interesting workarounds like https://www.figma.com/resources/assets/flow-arrows/.
草图在这里也很挣扎，但我们能否请您使用不同的箭头，大小和简便的更换帽盖方法？ 该菜单使用起来不是很直观，并且被隐藏起来，即使是最好的设计师也很难使用第一手工具来创建箭头。 它甚至导致了一些有趣的解决方法，例如https://www.figma.com/resources/assets/flow-arrows/ 。
(6. Status tracking)
These artboards have the same names but are at very different stages of the design process. It’s often difficult for teams to know what’s ready, what’s in progress and even who’s assigned to what. Our team has some interesting work-arounds but building in or integrating some form of project management would be game-changing for a design tool. Let me see what artboards are ready for review, help our development team understand what’s “ready”, and our product managers track progress.
这些画板具有相同的名称，但处于设计过程的非常不同的阶段。 对于团队来说，通常很难知道已经准备好什么，正在进行什么，甚至是由谁来分配。 我们的团队有一些有趣的解决方法，但是构建或集成某种形式的项目管理将改变设计工具的游戏规则。 让我看看准备审查哪些画板，帮助我们的开发团队了解“准备就绪”，以及我们的产品经理跟踪进度。
(7. Annotation mode)
It’s hard to capture design rationale, comments don’t quite fit the bill here as they’re intended to be for feedback and resolved. A dedicated annotation mode for documentation would make developer handover much easier and even help designers capture and communicate thoughts in one place.
很难掌握设计原理，注释不适合此处的草案，因为它们旨在提供反馈和解决。 专用的文档注释方式将使开发人员的移交更加容易，甚至可以帮助设计人员在一个地方捕获和交流想法。
(8. Print)
We love doing design reviews on printed out screens but this process is particularly painful. I’d love to see the ability to print artboards directly from Figma and even print the artboards with comments/annotations.
我们喜欢在打印出的屏幕上进行设计审查，但是这个过程特别痛苦。 我很乐意看到能够直接从Figma上打印画板，甚至可以打印带有注释/注释的画板的功能。
Figma could easily take on print design tools Figma可以轻松采用印刷设计工具
There’s also a broader question about whether it makes sense for Figma to also service print designers… The whole print design industry has been neglected in favour of digital design tools and it wouldn’t take much for Figma to adapt for print design and really lead this space.
还有一个更广泛的问题，那就是Figma也可以为印刷设计师提供服务是否有意义……整个印刷设计行业都被数字设计工具所忽视，Figma适应印刷设计并不需要花费很多时间空间。
(9. PDF invoices)
Figma’s invoicing feels like one of those well intended features that got built without asking the users that actually need invoices. Every month when I expense back the charge, the beautiful, unique, and annoyingly HTML invoices can’t be attached to corporate expense software. Please keep it simple and just email the bill as a PDF so users don’t have to go hunting through the billing and account settings to take a screenshot.
Figma的发票感觉就像是在不询问用户实际需要发票的情况下构建的良好预期功能之一。 每个月当我退还费用时，漂亮，独特且烦人HTML发票都无法附加到公司费用软件上。 请保持简单，只需将帐单以PDF格式通过电子邮件发送，这样用户就不必通过帐单和帐户设置来查找屏幕截图了。
(10. Plugin shortcuts + concurrency)
Currently, Figma does not allow multiple plugins to run at the same time 目前，Figma不允许多个插件同时运行
I’m loving the plugin community around Figma but wish that developers could get access to keyboard shortcuts and that plugins could run at the same time. I understand this is a monumental engineering task but Sketch for-better-or-worse has made it work and plugins such as https://sketchrunner.com/ have transformed design workflow. Some plugins also make sense to run-in the background (e.g. spell-check), so maybe this is the next iteration of plugin capabilities.
我喜欢Figma周围的插件社区，但希望开发人员可以访问键盘快捷键，并且插件可以同时运行。 我知道这是一项艰巨的工程任务，但Sketch forbetter-or-or-worse使其能够正常工作，并且https://sketchrunner.com/之类的插件已改变了设计工作流程。 有些插件也可以在后台运行(例如拼写检查)，因此也许这是插件功能的下一个迭代。
Overall it’s a great tool and I’m happy to see genuine innovation and competition in the crowded design tool market. I’m excited to see where Figma goes in 2020 and hopefully they’ll consider some of the above.
总体而言，这是一个很棒的工具，我很高兴看到拥挤的设计工具市场中出现了真正的创新和竞争。 我很高兴看到Figma在2020年的发展趋势，并希望他们能考虑上述问题。
翻译自: https://uxdesign.cc/my-figma-wish-list-10-features-to-build-in-2020-80002af3ed58
figma中文显示不出
