hmac java hmac java和python结果不一致

我从http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6238中借用了HMAC-SHA1 Java代码，并对其进行了一些修改，使其能够在已知输出的情况下使用一个已知的键/消息对。

然后我试图用Python编写相同的代码来验证结果，但是在Python和Java中得到了不同的值。

众所周知，Java值是好的。

Java代码：

import java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException;
import java.security.GeneralSecurityException;
import java.text.DateFormat;
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;
import javax.crypto.Mac;
import javax.crypto.spec.SecretKeySpec;
import java.math.BigInteger;
import java.util.TimeZone;
import java.util.Arrays;
public class make_hmac {
private make_hmac() {}
private static byte[] hmac_sha(String crypto, byte[] keyBytes,
byte[] text){
try {
System.out.println("Key is..." + bytesToHex(keyBytes) + "\n");
Mac hmac;
hmac = Mac.getInstance(crypto);
SecretKeySpec macKey =
new SecretKeySpec(keyBytes, "RAW");
hmac.init(macKey);
return hmac.doFinal(text);
} catch (GeneralSecurityException gse) {
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(gse);
}
}
private static byte[] hexStr2Bytes(String hex){
// Adding one byte to get the right conversion
// Values starting with "0" can be converted
byte[] bArray = new BigInteger("10" + hex,16).toByteArray();
// Copy all the REAL bytes, not the "first"
byte[] ret = new byte[bArray.length - 1];
for (int i = 0; i < ret.length; i++)
ret[i] = bArray[i+1];
return ret;
}
private static final int[] DIGITS_POWER
// 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
= {1,10,100,1000,10000,100000,1000000,10000000,100000000 };
public static String generateTOTP(String key,
String time,
String returnDigits,
String crypto){
int codeDigits = Integer.decode(returnDigits).intValue();
String result = null;
// Using the counter
// First 8 bytes are for the movingFactor
// Compliant with base RFC 4226 (HOTP)
while (time.length() < 16 )
time = "0" + time;
// Get the HEX in a Byte[]
byte[] msg = hexStr2Bytes(time);
byte[] k = hexStr2Bytes(key);
byte[] hash = hmac_sha(crypto, k, msg);
System.out.println("I hashed key " + bytesToHex(k) + " against message " + bytesToHex(msg) + " and got...\n");
System.out.println("HASHED: " + bytesToHex(hash) + "\n");
// put selected bytes into result int
int offset = hash[hash.length - 1] & 0xf;
int binary =
((hash[offset] & 0x7f) << 24) |
((hash[offset + 1] & 0xff) << 16) |
((hash[offset + 2] & 0xff) << 8) |
(hash[offset + 3] & 0xff);
int otp = binary % DIGITS_POWER[codeDigits];
result = Integer.toString(otp);
while (result.length() < codeDigits) {
result = "0" + result;
}
return result;
}
public static String bytesToHex(byte[] bytes) {
final char[] hexArray = {'0','1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','A','B','C','D','E','F'};
char[] hexChars = new char[bytes.length * 2];
int v;
for ( int j = 0; j < bytes.length; j++ ) {
v = bytes[j] & 0xFF;
hexChars[j * 2] = hexArray[v >>> 4];
hexChars[j * 2 + 1] = hexArray[v & 0x0F];
}
return new String(hexChars);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Seed for HMAC-SHA1 - 20 bytes
String seed = "3132333435363738393031323334353637383930";
long T0 = 0;
long X = 30;
long testTime = 1111111109L;
String steps = "0";
long T = (testTime - T0)/X;
steps = Long.toHexString(T).toUpperCase();
while (steps.length() < 16) steps = "0" + steps;
System.out.println(generateTOTP(seed, steps, "8",
"HmacSHA1"));
}
}
Python代码：import hmac
from hashlib import sha1
k = "3132333435363738393031323334353637383930"
msg = "00000000023523EC"
print "I hashed key", k, "against msg", msg, "and got...\n"
a = hmac.new(k, msg, sha1)
print a.digest().encode('hex')
运行Java的结果：Key is...3132333435363738393031323334353637383930
I hashed key 3132333435363738393031323334353637383930 against message 00000000023523EC and got...
HASHED: 278C02E53610F84C40BD9135ACD4101012410A14
07081804
运行Python的结果：I hashed key 3132333435363738393031323334353637383930 against msg 00000000023523EC and got...
fa9362e87c80a1ac61f705b5f9d5095adaec9525

“key”和“message”是相同的，但是Java版本得到的HMAC与Python实现不同。

我怀疑Python代码中的某个地方有一个微妙的错误(因为Java版本与RFC的预期结果相匹配)，但是我不确定在哪里。看起来很简单。