哪些表的索引个数过多:

prompt <p>当前用户下,哪些表的索引个数字超过5个的 

select table_name, count(*) cnt
from user_indexes
group by table_name
having count(*) >= 5
order by cnt desc ;

 哪些表的外键未建索引:

prompt <p>将外键未建索引的情况列出 
select table_name,
constraint_name,
cname1 || nvl2(cname2, ',' || cname2, null) ||
nvl2(cname3, ',' || cname3, null) ||
nvl2(cname4, ',' || cname4, null) ||
nvl2(cname5, ',' || cname5, null) ||
nvl2(cname6, ',' || cname6, null) ||
nvl2(cname7, ',' || cname7, null) ||
nvl2(cname8, ',' || cname8, null) columns
from (select b.table_name,
b.constraint_name,
max(decode(position, 1, column_name, null)) cname1,
max(decode(position, 2, column_name, null)) cname2,
max(decode(position, 3, column_name, null)) cname3,
max(decode(position, 4, column_name, null)) cname4,
max(decode(position, 5, column_name, null)) cname5,
max(decode(position, 6, column_name, null)) cname6,
max(decode(position, 7, column_name, null)) cname7,
max(decode(position, 8, column_name, null)) cname8,
count(*) col_cnt
from (select substr(table_name, 1, 30) table_name,
substr(constraint_name, 1, 30) constraint_name,
substr(column_name, 1, 30) column_name,
position
from user_cons_columns) a,
user_constraints b
where a.constraint_name = b.constraint_name
and b.constraint_type = 'R'
group by b.table_name, b.constraint_name) cons
where col_cnt > ALL
(select count(*)
from user_ind_columns i
where i.table_name = cons.table_name
and i.column_name in (cname1, cname2, cname3, cname4, cname5,
cname6, cname7, cname8)
and i.column_position <= cons.col_cnt
group by i.index_name);

  哪些表组合索引列过多

prompt <p>当前用户下,哪些组合索引组合列超过4个的
select table_name, index_name, count(*)
from user_ind_columns
group table_name, index_name
having count(*) >= 4
order by count(*) desc;

  哪些大表未建任何索引

--针对普通表(大于2GB的表未建任何索引)

select segment_name, bytes/1024/1024/1024 "GB", blocks, tablespace_name
from user_segments
where segment_type = 'TABLE'
and segment_name not in (select table_name from user_indexes)
and bytes / 1024 / 1024 / 1024 >= 2
order by GB desc;


--针对分区表(大于2GB的分区表未建任何索引)
--无论是建了局部索引还是全局索引,在user_indexes都可以查到,只是status不一样。
select segment_name, sum(bytes)/1024/1024/1024 "GB", sum(blocks)
from user_segments
where segment_type = 'TABLE PARTITION'
and segment_name not in (select table_name from user_indexes)
group by segment_name
having sum(bytes)/1024/1024/1024>=2
order by GB desc;

--注:无论是建了局部索引还是全局索引,在user_indexes都可以查到,只是status不一样。

  哪些聚索引列合因子差

prompt <p>当前用户下,哪些索引的聚合因子特别大。
select a.table_name,
a.index_name,
a.blevel,
a.leaf_blocks,
b.num_rows,
b.blocks,
a.clustering_factor,
trunc(a.clustering_factor / b.num_rows,2) cluster_rate
from user_indexes a, user_tables b
where a.table_name = b.table_name
and a.clustering_factor is not null
and a.clustering_factor / b.num_rows>0.9
order by cluster_rate desc ;

  哪些类型的索引已失效

prompt <p>失效-普通索引 
select t.index_name,
t.table_name,
blevel,
t.num_rows,
t.leaf_blocks,
t.distinct_keys
from user_indexes t
where status = 'UNUSABLE' ;


prompt <p>失效-分区索引
select t1.blevel,
t1.leaf_blocks,
t1.INDEX_NAME,
t2.table_name,
t1.PARTITION_NAME,
t1.STATUS
from user_ind_partitions t1, user_indexes t2
where t1.index_name = t2.index_name
and t1.STATUS = 'UNUSABLE';

  哪些索引单列组合有叉

prompt <p>当前用户下,哪些表的组合索引与单列索引存在交叉的情况。
select table_name, trunc(count(distinct(column_name)) / count(*),2) cross_idx_rate
from user_ind_columns
group by table_name
having count(distinct(column_name)) / count(*) < 1
order by cross_idx_rate desc;

---------例子

drop table t purge;

drop table t1 purge;
create table t1 as select * from dba_objects where object_id is not null;
create index idx_t1_objid_owner on t1(object_id ,owner);
create index idx_t1_object_id on t1(object_id );


drop table t2 purge;
create table t2 as select * from dba_objects where object_id is not null;
create index idx_t2_objid_owner on t2(object_id,owner);
create index idx_t2_object_id on t2(object_id);
create index idx_t2_owner on t2(owner);


drop table t3 purge;
create table t3 as select * from dba_objects where object_id is not null;
create index idx_t3_objid_owner on t3(object_id,owner);
create index idx_t3_owner_objid on t3(owner,object_id);
create index idx_t3_object_id on t3(object_id);
create index idx_t3_owner on t3(owner);


---执行如下语句,发现当前用户下,T3,T2,T1表存在索引单列组合有交叉,最严重的是T3
select table_name, trunc(count(distinct(column_name)) / count(*),2) cross_idx_rate
from user_ind_columns
group by table_name
having count(distinct(column_name)) / count(*) < 1
order by cross_idx_rate ;

TABLE_NAME CROSS_IDX_RATE
------------------------------ --------------
T3 .33
T2 .5
T1 .66

  哪些索引的高度比较高

prompt <p>当前用户下,哪些索引的高度比较高,大于5层(LEVEL=4)

select table_name,
index_name,
blevel,
leaf_blocks,
num_rows,
last_analyzed,
degree,
status
from user_indexes
where blevel>=4;

  哪些索引建后从未使用

prompt <p>当前用户下,哪些索引最近30天内从未被使用过。

set linesize 166
col INDEX_NAME for a10
col TABLE_NAME for a10
col MONITORING for a10
col USED for a10
col START_MONITORING for a25
col END_MONITORING for a25
--以下判断在最近30天内未被使用过的索引有哪些
select *
from v$object_usage
where USED = 'NO'
and START_MONITORING <= sysdate - 30
and END_MONITORING is not null;

--注,之前需有对索引进行监控,如
alter index idx_t_id monitoring usage;
---如果取消监控就是
alter index idx_t_id nomonitoring usage;

  哪些索引设置并行属性

prompt <p>当前用户下,哪些索引被设置了并行。

select table_name,
index_name,
blevel,
leaf_blocks,
num_rows,
last_analyzed,
degree,
status
from user_indexes
where degree>1;

  哪些索引统计信息太旧

--普通索引(从未收集过统计信息或者是最近10天内未收集过统计信息的表)
select index_name, table_name, last_analyzed, num_rows, temporary, status
from user_indexes
where status <> 'N/A'
and (last_analyzed is null or last_analyzed < sysdate - 10);


--分区索引(从未收集过统计信息或者是最近10天内未收集过统计信息的分区)

select t2.table_name,
t1.INDEX_NAME,
t1.PARTITION_NAME,
t1.last_analyzed,
t1.blevel,
t1.leaf_blocks,
t1.STATUS
from user_ind_partitions t1, user_indexes t2
where t1.index_name = t2.index_name
and (t1.last_analyzed is null or t1.last_analyzed < sysdate - 10);

 哪些主外键约束失效了 

prompt <p>当前用户下,哪些外键的约束失效了。

SELECT TABLE_NAME,
CONSTRAINT_NAME,
STATUS,
CONSTRAINT_TYPE,
R_CONSTRAINT_NAME
FROM USER_CONSTRAINTS
WHERE STATUS='DISABLED';
--试验

drop table t_p cascade constraints purge;
drop table t_c cascade constraints purge;

CREATE TABLE T_P (ID NUMBER, NAME VARCHAR2(30));
ALTER TABLE T_P ADD CONSTRAINT T_P_ID_PK PRIMARY KEY (ID);
CREATE TABLE T_C (ID NUMBER, FID NUMBER, NAME VARCHAR2(30));

ALTER TABLE T_C ADD CONSTRAINT FK_T_C FOREIGN KEY (FID) REFERENCES T_P (ID);
set autotrace off
INSERT INTO T_P SELECT ROWNUM, TABLE_NAME FROM ALL_TABLES;
INSERT INTO T_C SELECT ROWNUM, MOD(ROWNUM, 1000) + 1, OBJECT_NAME FROM ALL_OBJECTS;
COMMIT;
ALTER TABLE T_C DISABLE CONSTRAINT FK_T_C;

CREATE INDEX IND_T_C_FID ON T_C (FID);

  函数索引 

基于函数的索引是将一个函数计算得到的结果存储在行的列中, 而不是存储列数据本身。可以把基于函数的索引看作一个虚拟列上 的索引(这个列不是物理的存储在表中)。 

反向键索引 

反向键索引就是普通的B*TREE索引,只不过键中的字节会“反转”。利 用反向键索引,如果索引中填充的是递增的值,索引条目在索引中可以得 到更均匀的分布。如687002、687003、687004等值是顺序的,如果是传统 B*TREE索引,这些值就会在同一个右侧块上,加剧了块的竞争。如果反向 键索引:Oracle会逻辑的将687002、687003、00786都转换。一 下子距离变得很远,于是索引的插入立即分布到多块上去了。

全文索引 

Oracle实现全文检索,其机制其实很简单。即通过Oracle词法分析器 (lexer),将所有的表意单元(Oracle 称为 term)找出来,记录在一组以dr$开 头的表中,同时记下该term出现的位置、次数、hash值等信息。检索时, Oracle从这组表中查找相应的term,并计算其出现频率,根据某个算法来 计算每个文档的得分(score),即所谓的‘匹配率’。而lexer则是该机制的核 心,它决定了全文检索的效率。Oracle针对不同的语言提供了不同的lexer, 而我们通常能用到其中的三个

Oracle学习笔记索引分类(十五)_当前用户

 

 

位图索引之如何高效即席查询

 

/*
总结“本质圆滑音其实就是位图索引之间的与非运算非常高效!
*/

---做位图索引与即席查询试验前的准备
drop table t purge;
set autotrace off
create table t
(name_id,
gender not null,
location not null,
age_group not null,
data
)
as
select rownum,
decode(ceil(dbms_random.value(0,2)),
1,'M',
2,'F')gender,
ceil(dbms_random.value(1,50)) location,
decode(ceil(dbms_random.value(0,3)),
1,'child',
2,'young',
3,'middle_age',
4,'old'),
rpad('*',400,'*')
from dual
connect by rownum<=100000;

--注意,以下收集统计信息必须先执行。
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname => 'LJB',tabname => 'T',estimate_percent => 10,method_opt=> 'for all indexed columns',cascade=>TRUE) ;

---查询即席查询中应用全表扫描的代价
set linesize 1000
set autotrace traceonly
select *
from t
where gender='M'
and location in (1,10,30)
and age_group='child';

执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 489 | 113K| 1674 (1)| 00:00:21 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 489 | 113K| 1674 (1)| 00:00:21 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 - filter("GENDER"='M' AND ("LOCATION"=1 OR "LOCATION"=10 OR
"LOCATION"=30) AND "AGE_GROUP"='child')
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
6112 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
15885 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
943 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
50 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
723 rows processed

-- 以下是即席查询中,Oracle选择组合索引情况的代价和逻辑读(注意,回表的代价特别大)。
drop index idx_union;
create index idx_union on t(gender,location,age_group);
select *
from t
where gender='M'
and location in (1,10,30)
and age_group='child';

普通联合索引执行计划
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 810 | 180K| 793 (0)| 00:00:10 |
| 1 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 810 | 180K| 793 (0)| 00:00:10 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_UNION | 810 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 - access("GENDER"='M' AND ("LOCATION"=1 OR "LOCATION"=10 OR "LOCATION"=30)
AND "AGE_GROUP"='child')
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1071 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
318987 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
943 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
50 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
731 rows processed

--- 即席查询应用到位图索引,性能有飞跃,ORACLE自己选择了使用位图索引
create bitmap index gender_idx on t(gender);
create bitmap index location_idx on t(location);
create bitmap index age_group_idx on t(age_group);
select *
from t
where gender='M'
and location in (1,10,30)
and age_group='child';

位图索引执行计划
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 810 | 180K| 236 (0)| 00:00:03 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | T | 810 | 180K| 236 (0)| 00:00:03 |
| 2 | BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS | | | | | |
| 3 | BITMAP AND | | | | | |
| 4 | BITMAP OR | | | | | |
|* 5 | BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE| LOCATION_IDX | | | | |
|* 6 | BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE| LOCATION_IDX | | | | |
|* 7 | BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE| LOCATION_IDX | | | | |
|* 8 | BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | AGE_GROUP_IDX | | | | |
|* 9 | BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | GENDER_IDX | | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 - access("LOCATION"=1)
6 - access("LOCATION"=10)
7 - access("LOCATION"=30)
8 - access("AGE_GROUP"='child')
9 - access("GENDER"='M')
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
722 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
318987 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
943 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
50 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
731 rows processed

  位图索引之如何快速统计条数:

/*
总结:本质原因:其实就是位图索引存放的是0,1的比特位,占字节数特别少。
*/

--位图索引跟踪前准备
drop table t purge;
set autotrace off
create table t as select * from dba_objects;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
update t set object_id=rownum;
commit;

--观察COUNT(*)全表扫描的代价
set autotrace on
set linesize 1000
select count(*) from t;
COUNT(*)
----------
4684992
执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2966233522

-------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 20420 (11)| 00:04:06 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 294M| 20420 (11)| 00:04:06 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
66731 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
426 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed


--观察COUNT(*)用普通索引的代价
create index idx_t_obj on t(object_id);
alter table T modify object_id not null;
set autotrace on
select count(*) from t;
COUNT(*)
----------
4684992
普通索引的执行计划
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 3047 (2)| 00:00:37 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | |
| 2 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_T_OBJ | 4620K| 3047 (2)| 00:00:37 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
普通索引的统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
10998 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
426 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed

--观察COUNT(*)用位图索引的代价(注意,这里我们特意取了status这个重复度很高的列做索引)
create bitmap index idx_bitm_t_status on t(status);
select count(*) from t;

SQL> select count(*) from t;

COUNT(*)
----------
4684992

位图索引的执行计划
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 115 (0)| 00:00:02 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | |
| 2 | BITMAP CONVERSION COUNT | | 4620K| 115 (0)| 00:00:02 |
| 3 | BITMAP INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_BITM_T_STATUS | | | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
位图索引的统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
125 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
426 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed

  函数索引陷阱之30553的错误

/*
总结:大家在工作中用到自定义函数的时候也很多,因为自定义函数可以直接在SQL中调用,简化代码,
给编写数据库应用带来了很大的方便,但是与此同时我们要
考虑SQL中用到的自定义函数是否能用的上索引,因此我们在建自定义函数的时候尽量考虑加上DETERMINISTIC的
关键字,以方便将来用上函数索引。
引申联想:如果要用到自定义函数的函数索引,必须要有DETERMINISTIC的关键字,
对于指定了DETERMINISTIC的函数,
在一次调用中,对于相同的输入,只进行一次调用。
这要求函数的创建者来保证DETERMINISTIC的正确性,如果这个函数的返回值和输入参数没有确定性关系,会导致
函数结果异常的。

*/


ORA-30553错误
--建函数索引一般都是对ORACLE的自带函数做函数索引,如upper()等等,
--但是如果我们要进行基于自定义函数的索引的建立的时候,必须使用DETERMINISTIC关键字,
--否则会报ORA-30553错误,这点要引起大家的注意。

drop table test;
create table test as select * from user_objects ;
create or replace function f_minus1(i int)
return int
is
begin
return(i-1);
end;
/
---建完函数后我们试着建立函数索引,发现建立失败

create index idx_ljb_test on test (f_minus1(object_id));
将会出现如下错误:
ORA-30553: 函数不能确定

将函数加上DETERMINISTIC关键字重建
create or replace function f_minus1(i int)
return int DETERMINISTIC
is
begin
return(i-1);
end;
/
--现在发现加上DETERMINISTIC关键字后的自定义函数可以建立函数索引成功了!
create index idx_test on test (f_minus1(object_id));
explain plan for select * from test where f_minus1(object_id)=23;
set linesize 1000
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);

Connected to Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0
Connected as ljb
建立一个带DETERMINISTIC关键字的函数,功能就是返回值为1
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION F_DETERMINISTIC RETURN NUMBER DETERMINISTIC
2 AS
3 BEGIN
4 DBMS_LOCK.SLEEP(0.1);
5 RETURN 1;
6 END;
7 /
Function created
SQL> set timing on
发现执行时间非常快,0.765秒完成
SQL> SELECT F_DETERMINISTIC FROM user_tables;
F_DETERMINISTIC
---------------
1
1
这里略去另外73个记录(值都为1)
75 rows selected
Executed in 0.765 seconds
用不带关键字DETERMINISTIC的方式建立函数,功能也是返回值为1
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION F_DETERMINISTIC RETURN NUMBER
2 AS
3 BEGIN
4 DBMS_LOCK.SLEEP(0.1);
5 RETURN 1;
6 END;
7 /
Function created
Executed in 0.047 seconds
发现执行速度慢了好多,8.469秒
SQL> SELECT F_DETERMINISTIC FROM user_tables;
F_DETERMINISTIC
---------------
1
1
这里也略去另外73个记录(值都为1)
75 rows selected
Executed in 8.469 seconds
--带DETERMINISTIC的函数对于相同的输入只会运算一次,
--认为值是一样的,就把上次算出来的结果直接引用了,所以为什么第一种会执行速度这么快,
--因为第一种情况下根本该自定义函数就只调用了1次,然后另外那74次结果都是直接考虑到输入相同,
--直接把第1次调用的结果拿来用而已。而第二种其实是调用了75次。
--没有输入就是表示输入相同值的含义!(有输入的情况也,一样!)
--为什么ORACLE要对自定义函数做这个DETERMINISTIC限制呢?
--应该是有这两个原因吧:
--1、可避免我们建立一个不确定输出值的函数!(不过那不是建立自定义函数,是ORACLE自带函数失败),
--就和相同输入返回不同结果有关系。
--2、SQL中写函数函数很容易出现性能问题,比如你写个不好的函数,又被大量调用,
--那估计执行起来麻烦要大了,ORACLE这样做了,可以让写自定义函数的人在调用的时候一次执行多次使用结果,
--速度也可以快很多。

  函数索引与各种列的等式转换:

--测函数索引前准备
drop table t purge;
create table t as select * from dba_objects;
create index idx_object_id on t(object_id);
create index idx_object_name on t(object_name);
create index idx_created on t(created);


---比较where object_id-10<=30和where object_id<=40写法的性能
set autotrace traceonly
set linesize 1000
select * from t where object_id-10<=30;

执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 12 | 2484 | 293 (1)| 00:00:04 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 12 | 2484 | 293 (1)| 00:00:04 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1051 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
2898 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
437 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
39 rows processed

--其实你应该这么写代码的,才可以让oracle 用上索引。
select * from t where object_id<=30+10;

已选择39行。
执行计划
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 39 | 8073 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 39 | 8073 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_OBJECT_ID | 39 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
9 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4781 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
437 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
39 rows processed

--当然,你也可以这样建索引,如果不难为情的话。
create index idx_object_id_2 on t(object_id-10);

--确实走索引了,建这样的索引,你真是够有勇气了!
select * from t where object_id-10<=30;

执行计划
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3873 | 832K| 14 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 3873 | 832K| 14 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_OBJECT_ID_2 | 697 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
1 recursive calls
0 db block gets
9 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
2761 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
437 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
39 rows processed

  函数索引与各种列的函数转换

--测函数索引前准备
drop table t purge;
create table t as select * from dba_objects;
create index idx_object_id on t(object_id);
create index idx_object_name on t(object_name);
create index idx_created on t(created);


--对列做UPPER操作,无法用到索引
set autotrace traceonly
set linesize 1000
---以下语句由于列运算,所以走的是全表扫描
select * from t where upper(object_name)='T' ;
执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 12 | 2484 | 293 (1)| 00:00:04 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 12 | 2484 | 293 (1)| 00:00:04 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1049 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1500 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed

--去掉列的UPPER操作后立即用索引
select * from t where object_name='T' ;
执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1138138579

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2 | 414 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 2 | 414 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_OBJECT_NAME | 2 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
6 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1506 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed


--如果必须用upper的条件,那你想用到索引,就得去建函数索引
create index idx_func_ojbnam on t(upper(object_name));
--继续执行,终于走索引了。

select * from t where upper(object_name)='T' ;
执行计划
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 775 | 206K| 152 (0)| 00:00:02 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 775 | 206K| 152 (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_FUNC_OJBNAM | 310 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
6 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1500 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed

  函数索引与各种列的类型转换

/*
结论:什么类型就放什么值,否则会发生类型转换,导致系能问题!
(是存放字符的字段就设varchar2类型,是存放数值的字段就设置number类型,是存放日期的字段就设置date类型)
这里的案例宏中
select * from t_col_type where id=6; 用不到索引,要改成select * from t_col_type where id='6';
如果送来的参数无法保证是'6',只能写成select * from t_col_type where to_number(id)=6;并且建to_number(id)的函数索引
方可。

*/


--举例说明:
drop table t_col_type purge;
create table t_col_type(id varchar2(20),col2 varchar2(20),col3 varchar2(20));
insert into t_col_type select rownum,'abc','efg' from dual connect by level<=10000;
commit;
create index idx_id on t_col_type(id);
set linesize 1000
set autotrace traceonly

select * from t_col_type where id=6;

执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 36 | 9 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T_COL_TYPE | 1 | 36 | 9 (0)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 - filter(TO_NUMBER("ID")=6)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
32 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
540 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed

--实际上只有如下写法才可以用到索引,这个很不应该,是什么类型的取值就设置什么样的字段。

select * from t_col_type where id='6';
执行计划
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 36 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_COL_TYPE | 1 | 36 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_ID | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 - access("ID"='6')
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
4 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
544 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed

create index idx_func_tonumber_id on t_col_type(to_number(id));
select * from t_col_type where to_number(id)=6;

执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 100 | 4900 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T_COL_TYPE | 100 | 4900 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_FUNC_TONUMBER_ID | 40 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 - access(TO_NUMBER("ID")=6)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
4 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
540 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed

  反向键索引妙用之能减少争用

/
总结:好处:
反转前 --反转后
123 ---321
124 ---421
125 ---521

消除了热块竞争

坏处:
范围查询根本无法使用!
*/


drop table t1 purge;
create table t1 as select * from dba_objects;
insert into t1 select * from t1;
update t1 set object_id=rownum ;
create index idx_t1_rev_objn on t1(object_id) reverse ;

drop table t2 purge;
create table t2 as select * from dba_objects;
insert into t2 select * from t1;
update t2 set object_id=rownum ;
create index idx_t2_objn on t2(object_id) ;

create or replace procedure p_reverse as
begin
for j in 1..100 loop
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10008) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10009) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10010) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10011) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10012) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10013) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10014) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10015) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10016) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10017) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10018) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10019) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10020) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t1 where object_id=10021) loop
null;
end loop;
end loop;
end p_reverse;
/

create or replace procedure p_no_reverse as
begin
for j in 1..100 loop
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10008) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10009) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10010) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10011) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10012) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10013) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10014) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10015) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10016) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10017) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10018) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10019) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10020) loop
null;
end loop;
for i in (select * from t2 where object_id=10021) loop
null;
end loop;
end loop;
end p_no_reverse;
/

create or replace procedure p_remove_job as
BEGIN
for i in (select job from user_jobs )loop
DBMS_JOB.remove(i.job);
end loop;
END p_remove_job;
/

create or replace procedure p_test_reverse as
JOBNO NUMBER;
BEGIN
for i in 1..100 loop
DBMS_JOB.SUBMIT( JOBNO,
'p_reverse;',
SYSDATE,
'SYSDATE+1/1440');
end loop;
DBMS_LOCK.sleep(120);
END p_test_reverse;
/

create or replace procedure p_test_no_reverse as
JOBNO NUMBER;
BEGIN
for i in 1..100 loop
DBMS_JOB.SUBMIT( JOBNO,
'p_no_reverse;',
SYSDATE,
'SYSDATE+1/1440');
end loop;
DBMS_LOCK.sleep(120);
END p_test_no_reverse;
/


drop table test_latch purge;
create table test_latch (type varchar2(10),id number,gets number , misses number, sleeps number, immediate_gets number);

--测试1.

delete from test_latch where type='reverse';
insert into test_latch select 'reverse',1,gets,misses,sleeps,immediate_gets from v$latch where name='cache buffers chains';
commit;
exec p_test_reverse;
insert into test_latch select 'reverse',2,gets,misses,sleeps,immediate_gets from v$latch where name='cache buffers chains';
commit;
--测试结束
exec p_remove_job;


delete from test_latch where type='no_reverse';
insert into test_latch select 'no_reverse',1,gets,misses,sleeps,immediate_gets from v$latch where name='cache buffers chains';
commit;
exec p_test_no_reverse;
insert into test_latch select 'no_reverse',2,gets,misses,sleeps,immediate_gets from v$latch where name='cache buffers chains';
commit;
--测试结束
exec p_remove_job;


SELECT WHAT, INTERVAL, JOB, NEXT_DATE, NEXT_SEC, FAILURES, BROKEN FROM USER_JOBS WHERE INTERVAL = 'SYSDATE+1/1440';

--实际执行情况可能由于数据量不够大,并发不够大,而有差异。

select type,
misses - lag_misses
from (select t.*,lag(misses) over(partition by type order by misses) lag_misses
from test_latch t) k
where k.lag_misses is not null;

  全文索引性能优势之妙用索引

drop table test purge;
create table test as select * from dba_objects;
update test set object_name='高兴' where rownum<=2;
create index idx_object_name on test(object_name);
set autotrace traceonly explain
select * from test where object_name like '%高兴%';
exit;

grant ctxapp to ljb;
alter user ctxsys account unlock;
alter user ctxsys identified by ctxsys;
connect ctxsys/ctxsys;
grant execute on ctx_ddl to ljb;
connect ljb/ljb


--第一次执行无需注释掉其中头两条
Begin
ctx_ddl.drop_preference('club_lexer');
ctx_ddl.drop_preference('mywordlist');
ctx_ddl.create_preference('club_lexer','CHINESE_LEXER');
ctx_ddl.create_preference('mywordlist', 'BASIC_WORDLIST');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_INDEX','TRUE');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_MIN_LENGTH',1);
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_MAX_LENGTH', 5);
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','SUBSTRING_INDEX', 'YES');
end;
/

create index id_cont_test on TEST (object_name) indextype is ctxsys.context
parameters (
'DATASTORE CTXSYS.DIRECT_DATASTORE FILTER
CTXSYS.NULL_FILTER LEXER club_lexer WORDLIST mywordlist');


exec ctx_ddl.sync_index('id_cont_TEST', '20M');
set autotrace traceonly
set linesize 1000
select * from test where OBJECT_NAME like '%高兴%';
执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1357081020

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 34 | 7038 | 292 (1)| 00:00:04 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST | 34 | 7038 | 292 (1)| 00:00:04 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" IS NOT NULL AND "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE '%高兴%')
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1049 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1498 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed

select * from test where contains(OBJECT_NAME,'高兴')>0;
执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 49 | 10731 | 14 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TEST | 49 | 10731 | 14 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | DOMAIN INDEX | ID_CONT_TEST | | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 - access("CTXSYS"."CONTAINS"("OBJECT_NAME",'高兴')>0)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
11 recursive calls
0 db block gets
21 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1504 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed

select * from test where OBJECT_NAME like '%高%';
执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 34 | 7038 | 292 (1)| 00:00:04 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST | 34 | 7038 | 292 (1)| 00:00:04 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" IS NOT NULL AND "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE '%高%')
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1049 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1498 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed

select * from test where contains(OBJECT_NAME,'高')>0;
执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 49 | 10731 | 14 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TEST | 49 | 10731 | 14 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | DOMAIN INDEX | ID_CONT_TEST | | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 - access("CTXSYS"."CONTAINS"("OBJECT_NAME",'高')>0)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
11 recursive calls
0 db block gets
21 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1504 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed


具体理解
Oracle实现全文检索,其机制其实很简单。即通过Oracle专利的词法分析器(lexer),将文章中所有的表意单元(Oracle 称为 term,此处我理解为单词或者一些有
意义的词语) 找出来,记录在一组以 dr$开头的表中,同时记下该term出现的位置、次数、hash 值等信息。检索时,Oracle 从这组表中查找相应的 term,
并计算其出现频率,根据某个算法来计算每个文档的得分(score),即所谓的'匹配率'。而lexer则是该机制的核心,它决定了全文检索的效率。

Oracle 针对不同的语言提供了不同的 lexer, 而我们通常能用到其中的三个:

basic_lexer: 针对英语。它能根据空格和标点来将英语单词从句子中分离,还能自动将一些出现频率过高已经失去检索意义的单词作为'垃圾'处理,
如if , is 等,具有较高的处理效率。但该lexer应用于汉语则有很多问题,由于它只认空格和标点,而汉语的一句话中通常不会有空格,因此,它会把整句话作为
一个term,事实上失去检索能力。以'中国人民站起来了'这句话为例,basic_lexer 分析的结果只有一个term ,就是'中国人民站起来了'。此时若检索'中国',
将检索不到内容。

chinese_vgram_lexer: 专门的汉语分析器,支持所有汉字字符集。该分析器按字为单元来分析汉语句子。'中国人民站起来了'这句话,会被它分析成如下几个
term: '中','中国','国人','人民','民站','站起',起来','来了','了'。可以看出,这种分析方法,实现算法很简单,并且能实现'一网打尽',但效率则
是差强人意。

chinese_lexer: 这是一个新的汉语分析器,只支持utf8字符集。上面已经看到,chinese vgram lexer这个分析器由于不认识常用的汉语词汇,因此分析的单元非常
机械,像上面的'民站','站起'在汉语中根本不会单独出现,因此这种term是没有意义的,反而影响效率。chinese_lexer的最大改进就是该分析器能认识大部分常
用汉语词汇,因此能更有效率地分析句子,像以上两个愚蠢的单元将不会再出现,极大提高了效率。但是它只支持 utf8, 如果你的数据库是zhs16gbk字符集,则只
能使用Chinese vgram lexer。

  位图索引陷阱之更新列容易死锁

--位图索引遭遇锁困扰试验步骤1
sqlplus ljb/ljb
select sid from v$mystat where rownum=1;
insert into t(name_id,gender,location ,age_group ,data) values (100001,'M',45,'child',rpad('*',20,'*'));
--位图索引遭遇锁困扰试验步骤2
sqlplus ljb/ljb
select sid from v$mystat where rownum=1;
insert into t(name_id,gender,location ,age_group ,data) values (100002,'M',46, 'young', rpad('*',20,'*'));

--位图索引遭遇锁困扰试验步骤3
select sid from v$mystat where rownum=1;
insert into t(name_id,gender,location ,age_group ,data) values (100003,'F',47, 'middle_age', rpad('*',20,'*'));

--位图索引遭遇锁困扰试验步骤4
select sid from v$mystat where rownum=1;
insert into t(name_id,gender,location ,age_group ,data) values (100003,'F',48, ' old', rpad('*',20,'*'));

--暂且删除location和age_group列的位图索引,为下一试验做准备
--分别进刚才几个SESSION执行如下操作,完成回退
rollback;
--删除location和age_group列的位图索引
drop index location_idx;
drop index age_group_idx;


/*请自行测试锁的情况
位图索引之锁持有者的DELETE的实验
*/

--SESSION 1(持有者)
DELETE FROM T WHERE GENDER='M' AND LOCATION=25;
---SESSION 2(其他会话) 插入带M的记录就立即被阻挡,以下三条语句都会被阻止
insert into t (name_id,gender,location ,age_group ,data) values (100001,'M',78, 'young','TTT');
update t set gender='M' WHERE LOCATION=25;
delete from T WHERE GENDER='M';

--以下是可以进行不受阻碍的
insert into t (name_id,gender,location ,age_group ,data) values (100001,'F',78, 'young','TTT');
delete from t where gender='F' ;
UPDATE T SET LOCATION=100 WHERE ROWID NOT IN ( SELECT ROWID FROM T WHERE GENDER='F' AND LOCATION=25) ;
--update只要不更新位图索引所在的列即可

  位图索引陷阱之列重复度低慎建

---测试位图索引重复度前准备工作
drop table t purge;
set autotrace off
create table t as select * from dba_objects;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
insert into t select * from t;
update t set object_id=rownum;
commit;

--COUNT(*)在列重复度低时一般不会考虑使用位图索引

create bitmap index idx_bit_object_id on t(object_id);
create bitmap index idx_bit_status on t(status);
--注意,以下收集统计信息必须先执行。
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname => 'LJB',tabname => 'T',estimate_percent => 10,method_opt=> 'for all indexed columns',cascade=>TRUE) ;

set linesize 1000
set autotrace traceonly

/*
在object_id列建位图索引后,是啥情况
*/
--create bitmap index idx_bit_object_id on t(object_id);
select /*+index(t,idx_bit_object_id)*/ count(*) from t;
执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 17245 (1)| 00:03:27 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | |
| 2 | BITMAP CONVERSION COUNT| | 4688K| 17245 (1)| 00:03:27 |
| 3 | BITMAP INDEX FULL SCAN| IDX_BIT_OBJECT_ID | | | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
16837 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
426 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed




--create bitmap index idx_bit_status on t(status);
select /*+index(t,index idx_bit_status)*/ count(*) from t;
执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 105 (0)| 00:00:02 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | |
| 2 | BITMAP CONVERSION COUNT | | 4688K| 105 (0)| 00:00:02 |
| 3 | BITMAP INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX_BIT_STATUS | | | |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
125 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
426 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed

--原理分析:
set autotrace off
select segment_name,blocks,bytes/1024/1024 "SIZE(M)"
from user_segments
where segment_name in( 'IDX_BIT_OBJECT_ID','IDX_BIT_STATUS');

SEGMENT_NAME BLOCKS SIZE(M)
----------------------------- ----------
IDX_BIT_OBJECT_ID 17408 136
IDX_BIT_STATUS 128 1

  函数索引妙用之部分记录建索引

drop table t purge;
set autotrace off
create table t (id int ,status varchar2(2));
--建立普通索引
create index id_normal on t(status);
insert into t select rownum ,'Y' from dual connect by rownum<=1000000;
insert into t select 1 ,'N' from dual;
commit;
analyze table t compute statistics for table for all indexes for all indexed columns;


set linesize 1000
set autotrace traceonly
select * from t where status='N';
执行计划
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 10 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 1 | 10 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ID_NORMAL | 1 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 - access("STATUS"='N')
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
5 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
483 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed

--看索引情况
set autotrace off
analyze index id_normal validate structure;
select name,btree_space,lf_rows,height from index_stats;
set autotrace off
analyze index id_normal validate structure;
select name,btree_space,lf_rows,height from index_stats;
NAME BTREE_SPACE LF_ROWS HEIGHT
------------------------------ ----------- ---------- ----------
ID_NORMAL 22960352 1000001 3


--建函数索引
drop index id_normal;
create index id_status on t (Case when status= 'N' then 'N' end);
analyze table t compute statistics for table for all indexes for all indexed columns;
/*以下这个select * from t where (case when status='N' then 'N' end)='N'

写法不能变,如果是select * from t where status='N'将无效!我见过有些人设置了选择性索引,
却这样调用的,结果根本起不到任何效果!
*/

set autotrace traceonly
select * from t where (case when status='N' then 'N' end)='N';
执行计划
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 10 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 1 | 10 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ID_STATUS | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 - access(CASE "STATUS" WHEN 'N' THEN 'N' END ='N')
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
479 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed


--接着观察id_status(即函数索引)索引的情况
set autotrace off
analyze index id_status validate structure;
select name,btree_space,lf_rows,height from index_stats;

NAME BTREE_SPACE LF_ROWS HEIGHT
------------------------------ ----------- ---------- ----------
ID_STATUS 8000 1 1

 函数索引妙用之减少递归的调用:

drop table t1 purge;
drop table t2 purge;

create table t1 (first_name varchar2(200),last_name varchar2(200),id number);
create table t2 as select * from dba_objects where rownum<=1000;
insert into t1 (first_name,last_name,id) select object_name,object_type,rownum from dba_objects where rownum<=1000;
commit;

create or replace function get_obj_name(p_id t2.object_id%type) return t2.object_name%type DETERMINISTIC is
v_name t2.object_name%type;
begin
select object_name
into v_name
from t2
where object_id=p_id;
return v_name;
end;
/

set linesize 1000
set autotrace traceonly
select *
from t1 where get_obj_name(id)='TEST' ;
执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 10 | 2170 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1 | 10 | 2170 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
1057 recursive calls
0 db block gets
16007 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
410 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
404 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processed

create index idx_func_id on t1(get_obj_name(id));

执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 4083325411

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 10 | 22190 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 10 | 22190 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_FUNC_ID | 4 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
410 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
404 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processed

  函数索引陷阱之函数变更与影响

--函数索引陷阱  
--自定义函数使用函数索引要注意函数代码改变后的影响。
drop table t purge;
create table t ( x number, y varchar2(30));
set autotrace off
insert into t SELECT rownum, rownum||'a' FROM dual connect by rownum < 1000;
create or replace
package pkg_f is
function f(p_value varchar2) return varchar2 deterministic;
end;
/

create or replace
package body pkg_f is
function f(p_value varchar2) return varchar2
deterministic is
begin
return p_value;
end;
end;
/

create index idx_pkg_f_y on t ( pkg_f.f(y));
analyze table t compute statistics for table for all indexes for all indexed columns;
set autotrace on explain
SELECT * FROM t WHERE pkg_f.f(y)= '8a';

将包的代码修改如下:
create or replace
package body pkg_f is
function f(p_value varchar2) return varchar2
deterministic is
begin
return p_value||'b';
end;
end;
/

惊奇地发现查询出错误的值:
SELECT * FROM t WHERE pkg_f.f(y)= '8a';

在索引重建查询没有记录,这才是正确的结果:
drop index idx_pkg_f_y;
create index idx_pkg_f_y on t ( pkg_f.f(y));
SELECT * FROM t WHERE pkg_f.f(y)= '8a';

  反向键索引陷阱之不能范围查询

/
总结:好处:
反转前 --反转后
123 ---321
124 ---421
125 ---521

消除了热块竞争

坏处:
范围查询根本无法使用!
*/


drop table t purge;
create table t as select * from dba_objects;
update t set CREATED=sysdate-rownum ;
create index idx_rev_objn on t(object_name) reverse ;
create index idx_rev_created on t(created) reverse ;

set autotrace traceonly
set linesize 1000
select * from t where created=sysdate-1;
执行计划
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 12 | 2484 | 290 (0)| 00:00:04 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T | 12 | 2484 | 290 (0)| 00:00:04 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_REV_CREATED | 336 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1184 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
405 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processed


select * from t where created>=sysdate-10 and created<=sysdate-1;
执行计划
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 153 | 31671 | 296 (2)| 00:00:04 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 153 | 31671 | 296 (2)| 00:00:04 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1049 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1763 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
416 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
9 rows processed

  全文索引负面之缘何查不到记录

drop table test purge;
create table test as select * from dba_objects;
update test set object_name='高兴' where rownum<=2;
create index idx_object_name on test(object_name);
set autotrace traceonly explain
select * from test where object_name like '%高兴%';
exit;
sqlplus "/ as sysdba"
grant ctxapp to ljb;
alter user ctxsys account unlock;
alter user ctxsys identified by ctxsys;
connect ctxsys/ctxsys;
grant execute on ctx_ddl to ljb;
connect ljb/ljb


--第一次执行无需注释掉其中头两条
Begin
--ctx_ddl.drop_preference('club_lexer');
--ctx_ddl.drop_preference('mywordlist');
ctx_ddl.create_preference('club_lexer','CHINESE_LEXER');
ctx_ddl.create_preference('mywordlist', 'BASIC_WORDLIST');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_INDEX','TRUE');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_MIN_LENGTH',1);
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_MAX_LENGTH', 5);
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','SUBSTRING_INDEX', 'YES');
end;
/

create index id_cont_test on TEST (object_name) indextype is ctxsys.context
parameters (
'DATASTORE CTXSYS.DIRECT_DATASTORE FILTER
CTXSYS.NULL_FILTER LEXER club_lexer WORDLIST mywordlist');


exec ctx_ddl.sync_index('id_cont_TEST', '20M');
set autotrace off
set linesize 1000

select count(*) from test where contains(OBJECT_NAME,'高兴')>0;
COUNT(*)
--------
2
select count(*) from test where contains(OBJECT_NAME,'高')>0;
COUNT(*)
--------
2
select count(*) from test where contains(OBJECT_NAME,'兴')>0;
COUNT(*)
--------
0

  全文索引负面之值谨防数据更新

sqlplus ljb/ljb
drop table test purge;
create table test as select * from dba_objects;
update test set object_id=rownum;
commit;
update test set object_name='高兴' where object_id<=2;
create index idx_object_name on test(object_name);
set autotrace traceonly explain
select * from test where object_name like '%高兴%';
exit;
sqlplus "/ as sysdba"
grant ctxapp to ljb;
alter user ctxsys account unlock;
alter user ctxsys identified by ctxsys;
connect ctxsys/ctxsys;
grant execute on ctx_ddl to ljb;
connect ljb/ljb


--第一次执行无需注释掉其中头两条
Begin
ctx_ddl.drop_preference('club_lexer');
ctx_ddl.drop_preference('mywordlist');
ctx_ddl.create_preference('club_lexer','CHINESE_LEXER');
ctx_ddl.create_preference('mywordlist', 'BASIC_WORDLIST');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_INDEX','TRUE');
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_MIN_LENGTH',1);
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','PREFIX_MAX_LENGTH', 5);
ctx_ddl.set_attribute('mywordlist','SUBSTRING_INDEX', 'YES');
end;
/

create index id_cont_test on TEST (object_name) indextype is ctxsys.context
parameters (
'DATASTORE CTXSYS.DIRECT_DATASTORE FILTER
CTXSYS.NULL_FILTER LEXER club_lexer WORDLIST mywordlist');


exec ctx_ddl.sync_index('id_cont_TEST', '20M');
set autotrace on explain
set linesize 1000

select count(*) from test where contains(OBJECT_NAME,'高兴')>0;
COUNT(*)
----------
2

执行计划
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 78 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01|
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 78 | | |
|* 2 | DOMAIN INDEX | ID_CONT_TEST | 35 | 2730 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

update test set object_name='高兴' where object_id>=3 and object_id<=5;
commit;

--发现由于又修改了3条记录,查询本应该由2条变更为5条记录,但是发现再查,依然是2条!
select count(*) from test where contains(OBJECT_NAME,'高兴')>0;
COUNT(*)
----------
2

---继续执行同步命令后
exec ctx_ddl.sync_index('id_cont_test', '20M');

---再次查询后,终于发现这下是5条没错了。
SQL> select count(*) from test where contains(OBJECT_NAME,'高兴')>0;
COUNT(*)
----------
5



--解决方案,定时任务,自动同步

create or replace procedure sync_id_cont_test as
begin
ctx_ddl.sync_index('id_cont_test', '20M');
end;
/

VARIABLE jobno number;
BEGIN
DBMS_JOB.SUBMIT(:jobno,'sync_id_cont_test;', SYSDATE, 'SYSDATE + (1/24/4)');
commit;
END;
/

  索引的一些检查函数:

select t1.index_name,
t1.table_name,
t2.column_name,
t2.column_position,
t1.distinct_keys,
t1.num_rows,
t1.distinct_keys / t1.num_rows
from user_indexes t1, user_ind_columns t2
where t1.index_name = t2.INDEX_NAME
and t1.index_type = 'BITMAP'
and t1.distinct_keys / t1.num_rows >= 0.1;

---测试用例如下:
---测试位图索引重复度前准备工作
drop table t_bitmap purge;
set autotrace off
create table t_bitmap as select * from dba_objects;
insert into t_bitmap select * from t_bitmap;
insert into t_bitmap select * from t_bitmap;
insert into t_bitmap select * from t_bitmap;
insert into t_bitmap select * from t_bitmap;
update t_bitmap set object_id=rownum;
commit;
create bitmap index idx_tbit_object_id on t_bitmap(object_id);
create bitmap index idx_tbit_status on t_bitmap(status);

  哪些SQL存在列运算:

select sql_text,
sql_id,
module,
t.service,
first_load_time,
last_load_time,
executions
from v$sql t
where (upper(sql_text) like '%TRUNC%'
or upper(sql_text) like '%TO_DATE%'
or upper(sql_text) like '%SUBSTR%')
and t.SERVICE not like 'SYS$%';

  系统有哪些函数索引

select t1.table_name,
t1.index_name,
t2.COLUMN_NAME,
t2.COLUMN_POSITION,
t1.status,
t1.funcidx_status
from user_indexes t1, user_ind_columns t2
where t1.index_name = t2.INDEX_NAME
and t1.index_type = 'FUNCTION-BASED NORMAL';

  系统有哪些全文索引

select t1.table_name,
t1.index_name,
t1.parameters,
t2.column_name,
t2.column_position,
t1.status,
t1.domidx_status
from user_indexes t1, user_ind_columns t2
where t1.index_name = t2.INDEX_NAME
and t1.index_type = 'DOMAIN';

  系统有哪些位图索引

select t1.table_name,
t1.index_name,
t2.COLUMN_NAME,
t2.COLUMN_POSITION,
t1.status
from user_indexes t1, user_ind_columns t2
where t1.index_name = t2.INDEX_NAME
and t1.index_type = 'BITMAP';

  系统有无反向键索引

select t1.table_name,
t1.index_name,
t2.COLUMN_NAME,
t2.COLUMN_POSITION,
t1.status
from user_indexes t1, user_ind_columns t2
where t1.index_name = t2.INDEX_NAME
and t1.index_type = 'NORMAL/REV';